​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Portions of this website are reprinted and sometimes edited to fit the standards of this website under the Fair Use Doctrine of International Copyright Law as educational material without benefit of financial gain. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html 

Copyright 2013,14,15,2016 Tim Siewert

All Rights Reserved

Tim Siewert LLC- Products for the passionate shooter

​​​​​​​​​Executive Orders And The New American Sovyet

May 17, 2012

Dear Mr. Boehner, Mr. McConnell, et. al;

Our federal government is out of control.  It is not the role of the federal government to regulate the daily lives of the citizens.   It is not the role of the federal government to regulate domestic commerce.  It is not the role of the federal government to tell farmers what to grow, nor tell people what to eat.  It is not the role of the federal government to dictate the education of our children.  It is not the job of the federal government to trespass into state criminal investigations.

It is not the role of the federal government to control our rural or municipal affairs; yet, the President has now established federal councils for both rural affairs (Executive Order 13575—Establishment of the White House Rural Council June 9, 2011) and municipal affairs (Executive Order — Establishing a White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities May 1, 2012).  Russia called these councils the “sovyet” and they are the final building blocks to communism.  It is not the role of the Federal government to be the people’s nanny.

It’s not the role of the Federal government to spend this nation into oblivion.  Pardon me if I do not get excited about your current budget debate.  That drama has outlived itself, and I say let the government shut down for a while; we might buy a few more days of life for our Constitution.   I am also not impressed by your resolution on foreign affairs, encouraging “democracies” in foreign nations, while our republic is being actively destroyed by its own government.

It is your role, Congress, to stop the Executive encroachment into the Legislature and it is your duty to stop the Federal encroachment upon individual Liberty. Our founders took great care when creating a federal government that would be limited and always in submission to the states and the people.  WHEN is Congress going to take a real stand against the destruction of the rights and privileges of this people? Will you wait until it’s too late? Mere “outrage” doesn’t get the job done.  This Congress is pushing the nation to a point of turmoil it has not seen for 150 years.  And make no mistake; each and every one of you will be personally responsible for what will occur.  Are you prepared to live with that responsibility and those consequences?  It will not fall on the shoulders of the President alone and the blame game will not alleviate the suffering of our children when they are so grievously affected.  Yet, we can avoid repeating the mistakes of our history.  But we must act now. We must act decisively.  If not, we will regret our neglect.  We have the opportunity now, but have no guarantee it will be available much longer.

Does Congress truly understand WHY people fled communist nations to come to the greatest nation in the world?  Do you truly know the cost of such sacrifice and what you are supposed to be defending?  You are fooling yourselves if you think one more election is going to fix it.  You don’t have that kind of time.  The blocks are in place, and you have provided the mortar. Take a stand now.  Not a political stand, but a stand that involves integrity, courage, and resolve.  No more petitions asking the president to stop stealing legislative power.  No more demands that Eric Holder resign.  YOU must do your job and YOU must defend this nation and it’s Constitution from these enemies, both foreign and domestic.

You must:

• Put an end to the executive order madness.  Exercise your constitutionally given power, as provided through the checks and balances and separation of powers.  Show this nation that you understand that Legislative power is not to be shared and it is definitely NOT to be taken.We are not subjects of the United Nations and never intend to be.  Get them out of our business.​
• If you are unwilling to impeach, defund any person appointed by the executive branch outside Congressional and Constitutional authority.  (i.e. all the Christmas appointments and Czars)
• Pick up your Congressional oversight responsibility and shut down these executive regulatory agencies whose only purpose is to “harass our people, and eat out their substance.”
  
• Get control of the immigration in this nation.  We don’t want to see GAO reports telling us that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the State Department cannot agree on the degree of terrorist association a visa applicant must have to render the applicant ineligible.
  

It is time to indict Eric Holder for the criminal that he is. No more whining, no more demanding for resignations, INDICT him and then FIRE him.

Impeach Elena Kagan.  She is obviously incapable of using the appropriate professional ethic and judgment needed to be a Supreme Court Justice.  Learn from this mistake and actually involve yourselves in the confirmation process.  Your employers are sick to death of political games.

Repeal The Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act.  Now. You are supposed to be protecting the rights of the people, not violating them.

End the 4th amendment violations permitted in the Patriot Act.  Now.

Repeal sections 1021 & 1022 of NDAA 2012. It’s not only about habeas corpus, it’s about

• unilateral power given to the president by congress to determine who is a terrorist and then detain them in secret with no probable cause;
  
• unilateral power given to the president by congress to invoke the laws of war during a “hostility”;
  
• unilateral power given to the president by congress to transfer the power under the laws of war to “domestic agencies fighting terrorists”
  

Get the IRS out of the passport business.

Don’t just read the Constitution, study it.  Not how you studied it in law school, that wasn’t the Constitution, that was Constitutional Law, there is a huge difference.  Those of you who went to Harvard, we understand if you don’t know what the Constitution is, it hasn’t been studied there in years.  May I suggest a course that I know will teach you the truth and is so simple a Congressman can understand it.  I happen to know the teacher personally and I am sure that she would come teach it at her own expense and sacrifice.

These are some of the demands of your employers; we demand you do your job. These are the requirements of our founders; they have entrusted us with the Liberty purchased with their lives. These are the duties imposed upon you by the Constitution of the United States, and your obligations consistent with the oaths you took.

And, these are the times that try men’s souls.

How will history remember us? The generation that participated in death of Liberty or the generation that gave our last breath to prosper it?

I have made my choice. How will you choose?

Sincerely,
KrisAnne Hall

​​​​

​​

​

Oaths  by Anonymous

​

Today I would like to take you to the decline of theses united states into a corporation via contracts, treaties and executive orders.

Executive Orders first started because Congress was only in session for a short time each year to handle what few matters were under their constitutional and legitimate control.  This was also necessary because of the limited communications and travel of the day.  Executive orders were considered to be an exception rather than a rule to the natural law making process.  Teddy Roosevelt was the first president to issue over 1,000 Executive Orders (EO's).  To put this into perspective, President Washington issued 8 EO's and President Lincoln issued 48.

In 1952, for the first time, the judiciary imposed a limit on executive authority. In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court rejected an executive order by Truman as unconstitutional stating that "the power to issue Executive Orders must come from an act of Congress or the Constitution itself." (To find out more: do a search for http://people.howstuffworks.com/executive-order1.htm)

Keeping this in mind, one must take into account how the naturalization oaths have changed over the years to reinforce the notion that rights can be taken away by contract.

Since the first naturalization law in 1790, applicants for naturalization have taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States.  Before 1906, there were as many as 5,000 courts with naturalization jurisdiction.  Each court could develop its own procedures for administering the oath.  Some courts simply documented that applicants swore an oath. Other courts chose to write and print their own text for the oath, which the applicant would read at the final hearing.

In 1906 the Basic Naturalization Act also added the section of the oath requiring new citizens to defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; and bear true faith and allegiance to the same.  An official standard text for the oath of allegiance did not appear in the regulations until 1929.

Oath of 1929: I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely

and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and

fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, State, or

sovereignty, and particularly to __________ of who (which)

I have heretofore been a subject (or citizen); that I will

support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United

States of America against all enemies, foreign and

domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to

the same; and that I take this obligation freely without

any mental reservation or purpose of evasion: So help me

God. In acknowledgment whereof I have hereunto affixed my

signature.

The Immigration Act of September 23, 1950, added text to the oath of allegiance about bearing arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; and performing noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law (not all laws are constitutional).  The section of the oath of allegiance about performing work of national importance under civilian direction was added by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 and is the last major addition to the oath of allegiance as it appears today.

Today's oath: "I hereby declare, on oath, that I

absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance

and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or

sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a

subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the

Constitution and laws of the United States of America

against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will

bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will

bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by

the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the

Armed Forces of the United States when required by the

law; that I will perform work of national importance under

civilian direction when required by the law; and that I

take this obligation freely, without any mental

reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." (go

to: http://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/naturalization-

test/naturalization-oath-allegiance-united-states-america  

for the source of this material)

And, let us not forget the U.N. Arms Treaty.

To sum up: Treaties to grab guns, contracts to indenture citizens into military and/or civilian service,  contracts/ (licenses that turn rights into agreements and Executive Orders to subvert the natural law making process, have and are being used to establish The Corporation of America as the law of the land rather than The Constitution and The Bill of Rights.  The President is not doing this alone...he has the approval of Congress (since it is within their power to reign him in under their control which they have chosen NOT to do).

(This article was not intended to be an all inclusive history of the covered subjects; it was designed to make you think and perhaps motivate you to write about something else you believe has contributed to where this country has gone astray so that we might understand what direction we need to take to create what it is we want for our country today).​​​​​​​

​